{"id":1593,"date":"2021-01-25T11:46:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-25T14:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/?p=1593"},"modified":"2022-04-11T12:03:23","modified_gmt":"2022-04-11T15:03:23","slug":"is-the-new-procore-20g-double-forward-bevel-needle-capable-to-obtain-better-histological-samples-by-endoscopic-ultrasound-for-diagnosing-solid-pancreatic-lesions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/is-the-new-procore-20g-double-forward-bevel-needle-capable-to-obtain-better-histological-samples-by-endoscopic-ultrasound-for-diagnosing-solid-pancreatic-lesions\/","title":{"rendered":"IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Background:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Aim:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Methods:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Results:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51\u00b11.3 mm vs. 0.94\u00b10.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusions:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Background: It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. Aim: To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[406,405,407,408,409],"class_list":["post-1593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-original-article","tag-diagnosis","tag-endoscopic-ultrasound","tag-fine-needle-aspiration-biopsy","tag-fine-needle-biopsy","tag-pancreatic-cancer"],"acf":{"authors":[{"author_name":"Jos\u00e9 Celso ARDENGH","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5932-2499"},{"author_name":"Vitor Ottoboni BRUNALDI","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3315-8640"},{"author_name":"Mari\u00e2ngela Ottoboni BRUNALDI","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7404-6779"},{"author_name":"Alberto Facuri GASPAR","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2194-8015"},{"author_name":"Jorge Resende LOPES-J\u00daNIOR","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4857-2820"},{"author_name":"Ajith Kumar SANKARANKUTTY","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2689-6242"},{"author_name":"Rafael KEMP","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8008-2322"},{"author_name":"Jos\u00e9 Sebasti\u00e3o dos SANTOS","orcid_id":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5118-0361"}],"doi":"10.1590\/0102-672020200004e1554","buttons":{"pdf_-_en":1595,"pdf_-_pt":1594,"external_link":"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/abcd\/a\/zD5WW9R7NbhScC6bMvV54TL\/?lang=en","external_link_pt":"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/abcd\/a\/zD5WW9R7NbhScC6bMvV54TL\/?lang=pt","full_text":"","jats_xml":""},"volume_and_issue":{"article-volume":"2020 - vol. 33","article-issue":"Issue 4"}},"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}