{"id":2257,"date":"2019-12-09T07:46:53","date_gmt":"2019-12-09T10:46:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/?p=2257"},"modified":"2022-05-13T07:57:28","modified_gmt":"2022-05-13T10:57:28","slug":"effect-of-probiotic-oral-administration-on-skin-wound-healing-in-rats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/effect-of-probiotic-oral-administration-on-skin-wound-healing-in-rats\/","title":{"rendered":"EFFECT OF PROBIOTIC ORAL ADMINISTRATION ON SKIN WOUND HEALING IN RATS"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Background:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Manipulating intestinal microbiota with probiotics might stimulate skin response. Understanding all stages of the healing process, as well as the gut-skin-healing response can improve the skin healing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Aim:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>To evaluate the effect of perioperative oral administration of probiotics on the healing of skin wounds in rats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Methods:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Seventy-two Wistar male adult rats were weighed and divided into two groups with 36 each, one control group (supplemented with oral maltodextrin 250 mg\/day) and one probiotic group (supplemented with&nbsp;<em>Lactobacillus paracasei<\/em>&nbsp;LPC-37,&nbsp;<em>Bifidobacterium lactis<\/em>&nbsp;HN0019,&nbsp;<em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus<\/em>&nbsp;HN001,&nbsp;<em>Lactobacillus acidophilus<\/em>&nbsp;NCFM<sup>\u00ae<\/sup>&nbsp;at a dose of 250 mg\/day), both given orally daily for 15 days. The two groups were subsequently divided into three subgroups according to the moment of euthanasia: in the 3<sup>rd<\/sup>, 7<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;and 10<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;postoperative days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Results:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There were no significant changes in weight in both groups. Wound contraction was faster in probiotic group when compared to the controls, resulting in smaller wound area in the 7<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;postoperative day. As for histological aspects, the overall H&amp;E score was lower in the probiotic group. The probiotic group showed increased fibrosis from 3<sup>rd<\/sup>&nbsp;to the 7<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;postoperative day. The type I collagen production was higher in the probiotic group at the 10<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;postoperative day, and the type III collagen increased in the 7<sup>th<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The perioperative use of orally administrated probiotic was associated with a faster reduction of the wound area in rats probably by reducing the inflammatory phase, accelerating the fibrosis process and the deposition of collagen.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Background: Manipulating intestinal microbiota with probiotics might stimulate skin response. Understanding all stages of the healing process, as well as the gut-skin-healing response can improve the skin healing process. Aim: To evaluate the effect of perioperative oral administration of probiotics on the healing of skin wounds in rats. Methods: Seventy-two Wistar male adult rats were [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"no","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[590,291,321,86],"class_list":["post-2257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-original-article","tag-administration-oral","tag-probiotics","tag-rats","tag-wound-healing"],"acf":[],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2257"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2257\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}