{"id":5396,"date":"2013-06-01T10:40:30","date_gmt":"2013-06-01T13:40:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/?p=5396"},"modified":"2023-11-09T12:23:24","modified_gmt":"2023-11-09T15:23:24","slug":"bursting-pressure-comparison-between-stapler-and-staple-line-reinforcement-with-sutures-and-butress-biologic-material-an-experimental-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/bursting-pressure-comparison-between-stapler-and-staple-line-reinforcement-with-sutures-and-butress-biologic-material-an-experimental-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Bursting pressure comparison between stapler and staple line reinforcement with sutures and butress biologic material: an experimental study"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND: Staple line leaks carry significant morbidity and mortality. Reinforcement is controversial. Several staple techniques have been described for this purpose. Oversuture and butressing material are more common. AIM: To compare these two ways of reinforcement and staple line without any reinforcement regarding the bursting pressure. METHOD: Ten segments of small bowel were created in a pig under general anesthesia. The bowel was inflatted until burst point and the pressure was measured. RESULTS: The staple line bursting pressure was 94 mmHg +\/- 18,52mmHg in the stapler technique; 87,5 mmHg +\/- 18,59mmHg in the oversuture and 83,33 mmHg +\/- 23,04mmHg with Surgisis\u00ae. There was no statistic difference among the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Oversuture or Surgisis\u00ae use did not increase the staple line resistance in pig.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND: Staple line leaks carry significant morbidity and mortality. Reinforcement is controversial. Several staple techniques have been described for this purpose. Oversuture and butressing material are more common. AIM: To compare these two ways of reinforcement and staple line without any reinforcement regarding the bursting pressure. METHOD: Ten segments of small bowel were created in [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"no","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[1351,916,1352],"acf":[],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5396"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5401,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5396\/revisions\/5401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaabcd.org.br\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}