Although the presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer (CRC), until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the author of each study. Simultaneous approaches to treat CRC and CRLM seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter hospital length of stay, and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and the presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time.
The presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival and overall survival, the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer, and until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the authors of the studies.
Simultaneous approaches to treat colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter length of stay and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and colorectal liver metastases, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time
Although the presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer (CRC), until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the author of each study. Simultaneous approaches to treat CRC and CRLM seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter hospital length of stay, and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and the presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time.
Colon cancer is the third most common malignancy in Colombia, only exceeded by prostate and breast cancers. It is the second most common cancer among females and the third most common among males. The epidemiology of this disease has changed in Colombia, and its peak incidence has now surpassed that of gastric cancer.
We aimed to determine the association between hospital surgical volume and mortality in patients with colon cancer undergoing surgical resection in Colombia.
This was a national retrospective cohort study based on administrative data and included adult patients undergoing surgical resection for colon cancer who were enrolled in Colombia’s contributory health system between 2012 and 2017. We defined exposure as the hospital’s surgical volume where the colon cancer surgery was performed. We classified the patients as exposed to a high surgical volume (above the 90th percentile of the provider distribution) and a low surgical volume (under the 90th percentile). The main outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariate Poisson regressions were used to identify the association between exposure and mortality rates.
The study included 4,647 patients, of which 4,188 underwent surgery at hospitals with a colectomy volume lower than 33 per year and 459 underwent surgery at institutions with volumes equal to or higher than 33 per year. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for observable variables, a lower risk of 30-day mortality was found in patients who underwent surgery at high surgical volume institutions (relative risk - RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 0.033-0.97). No differences were found in the one-year mortality.
The high surgical volume of a hospital is associated with a 30-day mortality in colon cancer, as described in other studies, but the 1-year mortality did not show this association. Prospective studies are required to establish a causal relationship.
The laparoscopic approach considerably reduced the morbidity of colorectal surgery when compared to the open approach. Among its benefits, we can highlight less intraoperative bleeding, early oral intake, lower rates of surgical site infection, incisional hernia, and postoperative pain, and earlier hospital discharge.
To compare the perioperative morbidity of right versus left colectomy for cancer and the quality of laparoscopic oncologic resection.
Retrospective analysis of patients submitted to laparoscopic right and left colctomy between 2006 and 2016. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo scale, 30 days after surgery.
A total of 293 patients were analyzed, 97 right colectomies (33.1%) and 196 left colectomies (66.9%). The averageage was 62.8 years. The groups were comparable in terms of age, comorbidities, body mass index, and the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification. Preoperative transfusion was higher in the right colectomy group (5.1% versus 0.4%, p=0.004, p<0.05). Overall, 233 patients (79.5%) had no complications. Complications found were grade I and II in 62 patients (21.1%) and grade III to V in 37 (12.6%). Twenty-three patients (7.8%) underwent reoperation. The comparison between left and right colectomy was not statistically different for operative time, conversion, reoperation, severe postoperative complications, and length of stay. The anastomotic leak rate was comparable in both groups(5.6% versus 2.1%, p=0.232, p>0.05). The oncological results were similar in both surgeries. In multiple logistic regression, ASA statistically influenced the worst results (≥ III; p=0.029, p<0.05).
The surgical and oncological results of laparoscopic right and left colectomies are similar, making this the preferred approach for both procedures.
Despite major advances in the clinical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, some patients still present with acute colitis and require emergency surgery.
To evaluate the risk factors for early postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for acute colitis in the era of biologic therapy.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease admitted for acute colitis who underwent total colectomy at a single tertiary hospital from 2012 to 2022 were evaluated. Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Patients with more severe complications (CDC≥2) were compared with those with less severe complications (CDC<2).
A total of 46 patients underwent surgery. The indications were: failure of clinical treatment (n=34), patients’ or surgeon's preference (n=5), hemorrhage (n=3), toxic megacolon (n=2), and bowel perforation (n=2). There were eight reoperations, 60.9% of postoperative complications classified as CDC≥2, and three deaths. In univariate analyses, preoperative antibiotics use, ulcerative colitis diagnosis, lower albumin levels at admission, and preoperative hospital stay longer than seven days were associated with more severe postoperative complications.
Emergency surgery for acute colitis was associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Preoperative use of antibiotics, ulcerative colitis, lower albumin levels at admission, and delaying surgery for more than seven days were associated with more severe early postoperative complications. The use of biologics was not associated with worse outcomes.
Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments.
To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy.
The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit.
The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s.
The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources.
The Hartmann procedure remains the treatment of choice for most surgeons for the urgent surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis; however, it is associated with high rates of ostomy non-reversion and postoperative morbidity.
To study the results after the Hartmann vs. resection with primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV), and to compare the advantages between the two forms of treatment.
Systematic search in the literature of observational and randomized articles comparing resection with primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure in the emergency treatment of perforated diverticulitis. Analyze as primary outcomes the mortality after the emergency operation and the general morbidity after it. As secondary outcomes, severe morbidity after emergency surgery, rates of non-reversion of the ostomy, general and severe morbidity after reversion.
There were no significant differences between surgical procedures for mortality, general morbidity and severe morbidity. However, the differences were statistically significant, favoring primary anastomosis in comparison with the Hartmann procedure in the outcome rates of stoma non-reversion, general morbidity and severe morbidity after reversion.
Primary anastomosis is a good alternative to the Hartmann procedure, with no increase in mortality and morbidity, and with better results in the operation for intestinal transit reconstruction.
Desenvolvido por Surya MKT