Although the presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer (CRC), until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the author of each study. Simultaneous approaches to treat CRC and CRLM seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter hospital length of stay, and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and the presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time.
The presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival and overall survival, the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer, and until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the authors of the studies.
Simultaneous approaches to treat colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter length of stay and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and colorectal liver metastases, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time
Although the presence of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represents an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), the definitions of synchronicity are variable in the literature, including metastases at the time of diagnosis, or even before the diagnostic of the primary site of colorectal cancer (CRC), until either six or 12 months after the time of diagnosis, according to the author of each study. Simultaneous approaches to treat CRC and CRLM seem to be safe for patients carefully selected without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes, with similar complication rates, shorter hospital length of stay, and operation times even for major hepatectomies. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged, and both performance status and the presence of symptoms play important roles in the treatment sequence, perhaps avoiding two high-risk procedures at the same time.
Deaths related to colorectal cancer are generally associated with its metastases that affect the liver (50%) through the hematogenous route. Approximately 20-25% of these patients already have synchronous metastases in the liver at the time of primary tumor diagnosis. In others, liver metastases will occur during the course of the disease and are called metachronous. Metachronous metastases are believed to have a better prognosis; however, 20-25% of metastatic cases can be resected during the course of the disease. There is a lack of consensus on the diagnostic time interval for metastases to be considered metachronous in the consulted literature. Surgical treatment of metastases and lymph nodes is indicated, and extrahepatic neoplastic disease must be carefully evaluated. Liver transplantation can benefit the patient, should be evaluated, and is indicated in some special situations.
Biliary fistula is one of the most common complications after liver resection and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. One of the methods used to evaluate biliary fistulas is the White test, which consists of injecting a lipid emulsion into the bile duct. However, no standard technique for performing the White test has been published.
The aim of this study was to standardize the technique for performing the White test in patients undergoing hepatectomies, with and without previous cholecystectomy, and to assess the preliminary results.
Patients over 18 years of age who were submitted to open hepatectomy were included in the study. The primary outcome was the rate of biliary fistula. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of acute pancreatitis and overall morbidity, measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification.
The standard technique for the White test was performed on 17 patients. In total, three patients had previous cholecystectomy, and two had low insertion of the cystic duct, requiring cannulation of the hepatocholedochal duct. None of the patients developed clinically significant biliary leaks. Acute pancreatitis did not occur in any patient. One patient developed pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (Clavien-Dindo IV). All others had minor or no complications.
The standardized technique for performing the White test suggests an appropriate strategy to maximize the detection of intraoperative biliary leaks.
Liver metastases from melanomas, sarcomas, and renal tumors are less frequent. Treatment and prognosis will depend on whether they are isolated or multiple, size and location, the presence or absence of extrahepatic neoplastic disease, age, stage of the initial disease, initial treatments instituted, time of evolution, and clinical condition of the patient. Recently, a high number of oncological therapies including monotherapy or in combination, neoadjuvants or adjuvants, and immuno-oncological treatments have been developed and tested, increasing disease-free time and survival.
Complete removal of metastatic disease and maintenance of an adequate liver remnant remains the only treatment option with curative intent concerning colorectal liver metastases. Surgery impacts on the long-term prognosis and complications adversely affect oncological results. The actual morbidity involving this scenario is debatable and estimated to be ranging from 15% to 50%. Postoperative complications eventually lead to an increase in both mortality rates and tumor recurrence. Biliary fistula and liver failure are the leading complications following liver resection to metastatic colorectal cancer. Prophylactic drainage does not prevent fistulas or hemorrhage. Drainage along with endoscopic intervention and/or surgery may be necessary for grade B and C fistulas. Liver failure is a potentially lethal complication with few therapeutic options. Patient selection and preoperative care are crucial for its prevention.
In patients with synchronic liver colorectal metastasis, resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases is the only potentially curative strategy. In such cases, there is no consensus on whether resection of the primary tumor and metastases should be performed simultaneously or whether a staged approach should be performed (resection of the primary tumor and after, hepatectomy, or hepatectomy first). Patients with no bowel occlusion and with extensive liver disease are advised neoadjuvant oncological therapy. Similarly, various strategies such as portal vein embolization, liver deprivation, two-staged hepatectomy, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation are available for patients who do not have a sufficient future liver remnant (generally 30-40% of the total). Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach is required for the treatment of these patients.
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma presents unique challenges in perioperative management, requiring a comprehensive approach to optimize patient outcomes.
This case study focuses on the multidisciplinary management and innovative interventions performed in the perioperative care of a patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
A comprehensive assessment and treatment strategy involving neoadjuvant therapy and interventional radiology techniques were implemented. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to reduce tumor size and improve resectability. The crucial role of interventional radiology in managing postoperative complications is highlighted, particularly in the case of massive pulmonary embolism.
The neoadjuvant therapy successfully reduced tumor size, enabling an R0 surgical resection. Additionally, interventional radiology interventions, such as percutaneous pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy, effectively addressed the life-threatening complication of massive pulmonary embolism.
This article highlights the importance of a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach in managing complex oncological surgeries, especially regarding the hospital’s rescue capacity for severe postoperative complications. Emergent management with interventional radiology had a central role in resolving life-threatening complications.
Hepatectomy is historically associated with higher morbidity and mortality, related to intraoperative blood loss and biliary fistulas. Technological advances and improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques have led to greater safety in performing these surgeries.
The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing liver resections. The type of hepatectomy, indications, need for intraoperative blood transfusion, hospital stay, complications, and postoperative mortality were analyzed.
A total of 48 hepatectomies were performed during the studied period, the most common being 26 (54.16%) major hepatectomies, distributed among 13 (50%) left hepatectomies, 11 (42.30%) right hepatectomies, and 2 (7.70%) others. In total, 24 (45.84%) minor hepatectomies were performed, 11 (50%) mono segmentectomies, and 5 (22.72%) left lateral hepatectomies. The main indications for resection in benign diseases were 6 (12.50%) neotropical hepatic hydatidosis, five (10.41%) intrahepatic lithiasis, and in primary malignancies, 9 (18.75%) hepatocarcinomas. There was no need for an intraoperative blood transfusion. Hospital stays after surgery ranged from 2 to 40 days (average=7 days), and 41 (85.42%) patients went to the ICU in the first 72 h after surgery. In total, 9 (18.75%) patients developed postoperative complications. Overall mortality was 2.08%.
Hepatocellular carcinoma and neotropical hydatidosis were the main diseases with surgical indication, and major hepatectomies were the most performed procedures. Morbidity and mortality were in line with results from major global centers.
Morbidity of liver resections is related to intraoperative bleeding and postoperative biliary fistulas. The Endo-GIA stapler (EG) in liver resections is well established, but its cost is high, limiting its use. The linear cutting stapler (LCS) is a lower cost device.
To report open liver resections, using LCS for transection of the liver parenchyma and en bloc stapling of vessels and bile ducts.
Ten patients were included in the study. Four patients with severe abdominal pain had benign liver tumors (three adenomas and one focal nodular hyperplasia). Among the remaining six patients, four underwent liver resection for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, three of which had undergone preoperative chemotherapy. The other two cases were one patient with metastasis from a testicular teratoma and the other with metastasis from a gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor.
The average length of stay was five days (range 4–7 days). Of the seven patients who underwent resections of segments II/III, two presented postoperative complications: one developed a seroma and the other a collection of abdominal fluid who underwent percutaneous drainage, antibiotic therapy, and blood transfusion. Furthermore, the three patients who underwent major resections had postoperative complications: two developed anemia and received blood transfusions and one had biloma and underwent percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy.
The use of the linear stapler in hepatectomies was efficient and at lower costs, making it suitable for use whenever EG is not available. The size of the LCS stapler shaft is more suitable for en bloc transection of the left lateral segment of the liver, which is thinner than the right one. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of LCS for large liver resections and resections of tumors located in the right hepatic lobe.
Desenvolvido por Surya MKT