Menu
Nowdays, more relevant applications of perinatal derivatives, such as amniotic membrane (AM), are emerging in our environment as a source of biomaterials for use in different healing processes. The study of anastomosis healing associated with antimetabolic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a potential target of AM.
To evaluate the healing effects of AM in rats treated with 5-FU at a dose of 20 mg/kg on the seventh day of postoperative evolution, regarding the parameters percentage of type I collagen (mature), cell viability, microvascular density and formation of granulation tissue.
Thirty-two Wistar rats were used, submitted to colotomy and colorraphy, separated into four groups of eight, which received different treatments daily, intraperitoneally, until the day of sacrifice: saline solution (C), 20 mg/kg 5-FU, 20 mg/kg 5-FU and AM.
Treatment with 20 mg/kg of 5-FU, on the seventh postoperative day, induced adverse effects on the anastomotic healing process, evidenced by a decrease in the percentage of type I (mature) collagen, cell viability, microvascular density, fibrin-leukocyte scab formation and angiofibroblast proliferation; the use of AM under these conditions induced an improvement in the percentage of type I (mature) collagen.
Treatment with 20 mg/kg of 5-FU on the seventh postoperative day induced adverse effects on the anastomotic healing process, and the use of AM under these conditions induced an improvement in the percentage of type I (mature) collagen.
Postoperative anastomotic leak and stricture are dramatic events that cause increased morbidity and mortality, for this reason it's important to evaluate which is the best way to perform the anastomosis.
To compare the techniques of manual (hand-sewn) and mechanic (stapler) esophagogastric anastomosis after resection of malignant neoplasm of esophagus, as the occurrence of anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, blood loss, cardiac and pulmonary complications, mortality and surgical time.
A systematic review of randomized clinical trials, which included studies from four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Lilacs) using the combination of descriptors (anastomosis, surgical) and (esophagectomy) was performed.
Thirteen randomized trials were included, totaling 1778 patients, 889 in the hand-sewn group and 889 in the stapler group. The stapler reduced bleeding (p <0.03) and operating time (p<0.00001) when compared to hand-sewn after esophageal resection. However, stapler increased the risk of anastomotic stricture (NNH=33), pulmonary complications (NNH=12) and mortality (NNH=33). There was no significant difference in relation to anastomotic leak (p=0.76) and cardiac complications (p=0.96).
After resection of esophageal cancer, the use of stapler shown to reduce blood loss and surgical time, but increased the incidence of anastomotic stricture, pulmonary complications and mortality.
Desenvolvido por Surya MKT